PulseWatch manages 5 data types including abuse signals. Helps you organize, track, and share your work in 1 place for teams and solo users.

Active service issues

Slow responses, errors, partial outages, and issues affecting individual components or regions. Refreshed every minute.

62 services have issues in the available evidence: PulseWatch findings, corroborated incidents, or vendor reports. Our measurements do not need vendor confirmation. Corroborated means independent sources agree on the issue and scope. Each service is counted once, even when several sources or components are affected. Services that show the same notice from one shared vendor status page are listed together: 60 services show 51 vendor notices.

Services with issues

51 vendor notices

Corroborated incidents

PulseWatch observed

Community Watch

Community reports Unverified

Last refreshed Oct 10, 1:07 PM. 48 services checked in this feed; 32 matched to the catalog.

C Spire

Community reports indicate possible problems with C Spire.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

Catalog mapping pending.

View community report

DailyPay

Community reports indicate possible problems with DailyPay.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

Catalog mapping pending.

View community report

DirecTV

Community reports indicate possible problems with DirecTV.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

Catalog mapping pending.

View community report

DoorDash

Community reports indicate possible problems with DoorDash.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

View community report

Florida Power & Light

Community reports indicate possible problems with Florida Power & Light.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

Catalog mapping pending.

View community report

Huntington Bank

Community reports indicate possible problems with Huntington Bank.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

View community report

Mediacom

Community reports indicate possible problems with Mediacom.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

View community report

Point Broadband

Community reports indicate possible problems with Point Broadband.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

Catalog mapping pending.

View community report

Skyward

Community reports indicate possible problems with Skyward.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

Catalog mapping pending.

View community report

Straight Talk

Community reports indicate possible problems with Straight Talk.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

Catalog mapping pending.

View community report

WOW

Community reports indicate possible problems with WOW.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

Catalog mapping pending.

View community report

Walmart

Community reports indicate possible problems with Walmart.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

View community report

YouTube TV

Community reports indicate possible problems with YouTube TV.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

View community report

itch.io

Community reports indicate possible problems with itch.io.

Collected Oct 10, 12:58 PM

Community signal; independent corroboration is not yet established.

View community report

Services with issues

PulseWatch findings and vendor reports appear together, with each service counted once. Services that show the same vendor notice from one shared status page are listed together as one entry. Slow responses, errors, and component or regional issues do not mean an entire service is down.

62 services shown in 53 entries

One vendor notice on 2 services: Anthropic, Claude
- Anthropic
- Claude
Major issue
Vendor-reported
Anthropic: Elevated errors on platform.claude.com
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
official status feed · checked 3m ago · vendor posted 2d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
These services share one vendor status page, and each shows this same notice, so it is listed once.
Anthropic
Detected byVendor statement
Source: vendor:status.anthropic.com
Independent origins
1
Corroborating signals
1 evidence row
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 7, 2026 13:28 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Claude
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.anthropic.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 7, 2026 13:40 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Bandwidth
Major issue
Vendor-reported
Bandwidth Local Market Impairment - 122 - Manchester, NH
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1h ago · vendor posted 1d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.bandwidth.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a critical-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
moderategraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 00:05 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Circle (USDC)
Major issue
Vendor-reported
USDC on XRP
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 56m ago · vendor posted 21h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.circle.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 18:12 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
100/100
3 of 3 assessed samples succeeded within their latency target.
6/6 responses validated in the last 15 minutes. 3 successful samples have no qualified latency target.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Cloudflare
Major issue
Vendor-reported
Elevated Errors in China Network Colos
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 56m ago · vendor posted 8h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: www.cloudflarestatus.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 10, 2026 04:36 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
100/100
2 of 2 assessed samples succeeded within their latency target.
5/5 responses validated in the last 15 minutes. 3 successful samples have no qualified latency target.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
CloudSigma
Major issue
Vendor-reported
[ALL] Chat & Ticketing System Unavailable
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 51m ago · vendor posted 12d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.cloudsigma.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 10, 2026 04:41 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Datto RMM
Major issue
Vendor-reported
DattoRMM - All Platforms - MacOS Agent Connectivity Issues
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 51m ago · vendor posted 7d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Drata
Major issue
Vendor-reported
Some Policy PDF Downloads Missing Appendix Page
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 46m ago · vendor posted 4d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
One vendor notice on 4 services: Elastic, Elastic Cloud, Elastic Observability, Elasticsearch
Major issue
Vendor-reported
Connectivity disruption for AWS Bahrain (me-south-1)
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 46m ago · vendor posted 7mo ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
These services share one vendor status page, and each shows this same notice, so it is listed once.
Elastic
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Elastic Cloud
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Elastic Observability
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Elasticsearch
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
One vendor notice on 2 services: ESET, ESET PROTECT
- ESET
- ESET PROTECT
Major issue
Vendor-reported
Customers connected via Telia ISP cannot connect to ESET Cloud Services
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 46m ago · vendor posted 3mo ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
These services share one vendor status page, and each shows this same notice, so it is listed once.
ESET
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
ESET PROTECT
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Flutterwave
Major issue
Vendor-reported
[Ghana] Service Alert: Incoming Payments Delays
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 41m ago · vendor posted 2mo ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Genesys
Major issue
Vendor-reported
Genesys: Elevated Error Rates - EMEA (UAE)
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
official status feed · checked 8m ago · vendor posted 2mo ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
GroqCloud
Major issue
Vendor-reported
Model Performance or Availability Issue - minimaxai/minimax-m2.7
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 36m ago · vendor posted 3h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: groqstatus.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 10, 2026 10:56 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
MongoDB Atlas
Major issue
Vendor-reported
MongoDB Atlas: Impaired Cluster operations in AWS me-central-1 and AWS me-south-1
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
official status feed · checked 8m ago · vendor posted 1mo ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Secoda
Major issue
Vendor-reported
Status page lists APAC API: downtime
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 10m ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
One vendor notice on 2 services: Tenable, Tenable Vulnerability Management
- Tenable
- Tenable Vulnerability Management
Major issue
Vendor-reported
Tenable Vulnerability Management: RBAC Permissions Issue with Custom Roles
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1m ago · vendor posted 3d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
These services share one vendor status page, and each shows this same notice, so it is listed once.
Tenable
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.tenable.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 23:47 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.tenable.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 23:47 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
One vendor notice on 2 services: Akamai, Akamai Edge
- Akamai
- Akamai Edge
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Origin Server Connectivity Issues with Elevated Errors in APAC Region
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1h ago · vendor posted 17d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
These services share one vendor status page, and each shows this same notice, so it is listed once.
Akamai
Detected byVendor statement
Source: www.akamaistatus.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 1, 2026 16:36 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Akamai Edge
Detected byVendor statement
Source: www.akamaistatus.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 1, 2026 17:57 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Anthology Blackboard
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Student Application Unavailable on Citrix - Global
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1h ago · vendor posted 12d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.anthology.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 15:12 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Arctic Wolf
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Arctic Wolf Agent Downloads failing
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1h ago · vendor posted 22h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.arcticwolf.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 8, 2026 20:56 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
One vendor notice on 2 services: ChatGPT, OpenAI
- ChatGPT
- OpenAI
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
OpenAI: Delayed Costs data in the Compliance API
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
official status feed · checked 3m ago · vendor posted 19h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
These services share one vendor status page, and each shows this same notice, so it is listed once.
ChatGPT
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.openai.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 18:01 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
OpenAI
Detected byVendor statement
Source: vendor:status.openai.com
Independent origins
1
Corroborating signals
1 evidence row
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 21:13 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Cisco ThousandEyes
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Dashboard widgets showing data for Events datasource are affected in US1 region.
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1m ago · vendor posted 8h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.thousandeyes.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 08:31 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Clerk
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Development instances only - Apple rejecting emails
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 56m ago · vendor posted 11d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Cloudflare Zero Trust
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Incorrect geo location for some Cloudflare WARP users
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 51m ago · vendor posted 1mo ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Cloudways
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Degradation Impacting Vultr Server Operations
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 51m ago · vendor posted 9d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Coinbase
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Delayed Sends and Receives - EGLD (MultiversX)
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 51m ago · vendor posted 21d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
3/3 responses validated in the last 15 minutes. 3 successful samples have no qualified latency target.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Couchbase Capella
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Capella Operations Impacted by GCP us-central1 region capacity issues
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 51m ago · vendor posted 3d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Delta Air Lines
Degraded / partial issue
PulseWatch observed
Server errors measured by PulseWatch checks.
Scope: measured endpoint · Affected geography not established
1 independent measurement origin · checked just now
View our measurements
pulsewatch-runtime · availability · observed 10m ago
Vendor confirmation is not required. These findings describe the measured scope; paging requires independent corroboration.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
PulseWatch observed
1 independent origin.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Fireworks AI
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Service Degradation for Qwen 3.8 Max
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 41m ago · vendor posted 2h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.fireworks.ai
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 10, 2026 12:21 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
GoCardless
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Intermittent ARUDD-8 failures for Nationwide Bank
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 36m ago · vendor posted 15d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
One vendor notice on 2 services: Grafana, Grafana Cloud
- Grafana
- Grafana Cloud
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
IRM Unable to Send SMS to Thailand, Bangladesh, and Austrian Numbers
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 36m ago · vendor posted 4d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
These services share one vendor status page, and each shows this same notice, so it is listed once.
Grafana
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.grafana.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 8, 2026 21:37 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Grafana Cloud
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.grafana.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 8, 2026 21:38 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Heap
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Salesforce integration: data-in not syncing
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 36m ago · vendor posted 7d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Kraken
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Decred (DCR) deposits temporarily unavailable
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 31m ago · vendor posted 21h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
100/100
3 of 3 assessed samples succeeded within their latency target.
6/6 responses validated in the last 15 minutes. 3 successful samples have no qualified latency target.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Ledger
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Stellar (XLM) Mainnet Degraded Service
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 2m ago · vendor posted 2mo ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
100/100
2 of 2 assessed samples succeeded within their latency target.
5/5 responses validated in the last 15 minutes. 3 successful samples have no qualified latency target.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Linode
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Service Issue - Cloud Manager and API
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 26m ago · vendor posted 1d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.linode.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 05:07 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
100/100
2 of 2 assessed samples succeeded within their latency target.
5/5 responses validated in the last 15 minutes. 3 successful samples have no qualified latency target.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Matillion
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Partially Degraded Service
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 26m ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Mercury
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Failed Investments Wire Transfers Out for Some Customers
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 21m ago · vendor posted 2d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.mercury.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 7, 2026 23:10 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Mono
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
FCMB Mobile (Authentication Outage)
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 3m ago · vendor posted 17mo ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Qualys
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
IN Platform 1: Performance issues observed on VMDR pages (IM-12904)
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 11m ago · vendor posted 3d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: vendor:status.qualys.com
Independent origins
1
Corroborating signals
1 evidence row
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 10, 2026 11:17 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
QuickNode
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Morph mainnet : Degraded performance in EU region
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 2m ago · vendor posted 4h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: vendor:status.quicknode.com
Independent origins
1
Corroborating signals
1 evidence row
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 10, 2026 09:36 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Retool
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Elevated Latency on Query Execution (Retool Cloud)
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 10m ago · vendor posted 4d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Sage Intacct
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Banking Service - Partial Outage
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 10m ago · vendor posted 18d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: vendor:status.sage.com
Independent origins
1
Corroborating signals
1 evidence row
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 7, 2026 16:07 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Scaleway
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
[Support] Delays in ticket processing
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 10m ago · vendor posted 1d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Shippo
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Elevated error rate on DPD Germany Tracking
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 3m ago · vendor posted 6h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: vendor:status.goshippo.com
Independent origins
1
Corroborating signals
1 evidence row
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 10, 2026 06:55 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Showmax
Degraded / partial issue
PulseWatch observed
DNS resolution failures observed by public resolvers.
Scope: measured endpoint · Affected geography not established
1 independent measurement origin · checked just now
View our measurements
public-dns-consensus · availability · observed 2m ago
Vendor confirmation is not required. These findings describe the measured scope; paging requires independent corroboration.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
PulseWatch observed
1 independent origin.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Slack
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Slack: Slack for iOS closing unexpectedly when opening channels
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
official status feed · checked 3m ago · vendor posted 21h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: vendor:status.slack.com
Independent origins
1
Corroborating signals
1 evidence row
Vendor claim
partial
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 15:56 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Snowflake
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
INC20000150
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 3m ago · vendor posted 1mo ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Spendesk
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
3DS Authentication – Notifications Not Received on iOS
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 9m ago · vendor posted 3d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Sumsub
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Connectivity issues for some users in Vietnam
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1m ago · vendor posted 7d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Twilio
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Twilio: SMS Delivery Receipt Delays from a Subset of Twilio Short Codes to Multiple Networks in New Zealand
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
official status feed · checked 3m ago · vendor posted 9h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: vendor:status.twilio.com
Independent origins
1
Corroborating signals
1 evidence row
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 10, 2026 08:31 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
UpCloud
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
[SG-SIN1] Managed Object Storage Issue
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1h ago · vendor posted 4d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
WatchGuard Cloud
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
2026-10-09 - GLOBAL - Panda System Management operational issues
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1h ago · vendor posted 1d ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.watchguard.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 08:45 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Wiz
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
AWS me-central-1 Service Disruption
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1h ago · vendor posted 7mo ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Xendit
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Over-The-Counter ECPAY_LOAN Philippines Disruption
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1h ago · vendor posted 4h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.xendit.co
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 9, 2026 07:20 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.
Zulip
Degraded / partial issue
Vendor-reported
Partially Degraded Service
Affected scope is described in the vendor notice; service-wide impact is not established.
vendor status API · checked 1h ago
This vendor notice needs independent evidence matching its issue and affected scope to clear the two-source gate.
Observed health
Unknown
No samples qualify for a combined success and latency score.
Evidence strength
Vendor-reported
An official notice is available; independent agreement is unproven.
Evidence describes support for an issue, not its outage probability.
How this score works
100 × successful samples within the latency target ÷ assessed samples. Targets use a historical operation-latency baseline and are heuristic. Server failures count as failed samples; successful responses without a qualified target are shown separately. Only named operations are measured. Vendor statements, report volume, forecasts and incident records do not add score points.
A component issue stays visible even when other operations pass. Forecasts are separate from current health.

33 other services have open records awaiting fresh corroboration (28 after grouping services that show the same vendor notice). Those records alone do not establish a current issue.

Open records without current evidence (4)

These services have an open incident record but no current vendor notice, corroborated evidence or PulseWatch finding. A record alone does not establish a current issue.

GitHub
Record opened 2d ago
Detected byVendor statement
Source: vendor:githubstatus.com
Independent origins
1
Corroborating signals
1 evidence row
Vendor claim
a critical-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
moderategraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 7, 2026 15:47 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
FOSSA
Record opened 3d ago
Detected byVendor statement
Source: vendor:status.fossa.com
Independent origins
1
Corroborating signals
1 evidence row
Vendor claim
a partial outage
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 6, 2026 21:25 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Airwallex
Record opened 7d ago
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.airwallex.com
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a major-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Oct 3, 2026 11:50 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.
Snyk
Record opened 11d ago
Detected byVendor statement
Source: status.snyk.io
Independent origins
0
Corroborating signals
None in current evidence
Vendor claim
a minor-impact incident
Our evidence-based assessment
minorgraded from this incident’s evidence · Sep 29, 2026 12:56 UTC
The assessment is a measurement of this incident’s evidence. It does not change PulseWatch’s detection decision, the recorded severity, or who is alerted.

Active service issues

Community Watch

Services with issues

One vendor notice on 2 services: Anthropic, Claude

Observed health

Evidence strength

Observed health

Evidence strength

Bandwidth

Observed health

Evidence strength

Circle (USDC)

Observed health

Evidence strength

Cloudflare

Observed health

Evidence strength

CloudSigma

Observed health

Evidence strength

Datto RMM

Observed health

Evidence strength

Drata

Observed health

Evidence strength

One vendor notice on 4 services: Elastic, Elastic Cloud, Elastic Observability, Elasticsearch

Observed health

Evidence strength

Observed health

Evidence strength

Observed health

Evidence strength

Observed health

Evidence strength

One vendor notice on 2 services: ESET, ESET PROTECT

Observed health

Evidence strength

Observed health

Evidence strength

Flutterwave

Observed health

Evidence strength

Genesys

Observed health

Evidence strength

GroqCloud

Observed health

Evidence strength

MongoDB Atlas

Observed health

Evidence strength

Secoda

Observed health

Evidence strength

One vendor notice on 2 services: Tenable, Tenable Vulnerability Management

Observed health

Evidence strength

Observed health

Evidence strength

One vendor notice on 2 services: Akamai, Akamai Edge

Observed health

Evidence strength

Observed health

Evidence strength

Anthology Blackboard

Observed health

Evidence strength

Arctic Wolf

Observed health

Evidence strength

One vendor notice on 2 services: ChatGPT, OpenAI

Observed health

Evidence strength

Observed health

Evidence strength

Cisco ThousandEyes

Observed health

Evidence strength

Clerk